SciTopusCognitive bias wheel

You might be wrong.

It happens to everyone. Find a thinking trap, understand it, and share a link.

Availability heuristicAttentional biasIllusory truth effectMere–exposure effectContext effectCue–dependent forgettingMood–congruent memory biasFrequency illusionBaader–Meinhof PhenomenonEmpathy gapOmission biasBase rate fallacyBizarreness effectHumor effectVon Restorff effectPicture superiority effectSelf–relevance effectNegativity biasAnchoringConservatismContrast effectDistinction biasFocusing effectFraming effectMoney illusionWeber–Fechner lawConfirmation biasCongruence biasPost–purchase rationalizationChoice–supportive biasSelective perceptionObserver–expectancy effectExperimenter's biasObserver effectExpectation biasOstrich effectSubjective validationContinued influence effectSemmelweis reflexBias blind spotNaïve cynicismNaïve realismConfabulationClustering illusionInsensitivity to sample sizeNeglect of probabilityAnecdotal fallacyIllusion of validityMasked–man fallacyRecency illusionGambler's fallacyHot–hand fallacyIllusory correlationPareidoliaAnthropomorphismGroup attribution errorUltimate attribution errorStereotypingEssentialismFunctional fixednessMoral credential effectJust–world hypothesisArgument from fallacyAuthority biasAutomation biasBandwagon effectPlacebo effectOut–group homogeneity biasCross–race effectIn–group favoritismHalo effectCheerleader effectPositivity effectNot invented hereReactive devaluationWell–traveled road effectMental accountingAppeal to probability fallacyNormalcy biasMurphy's LawZero sum biasSurvivorship biasSubadditivity effectDenomination effectThe magical number 7 ± 2Illusion of transparencyCurse of knowledgeSpotlight effectExtrinsic incentive errorIllusion of external agencyIllusion of asymmetric insightTelescoping effectRosy retrospectionHindsight biasOutcome biasMoral luckDeclinismImpact biasPessimism biasPlanning fallacyTime–saving biasPro–innovation biasProjection biasRestraint biasSelf–consistency biasOverconfidence effectSocial desirability biasThird–person effectFalse consensus effectHard–easy effectLake Wobegone effectDunning–Kruger effectEgocentric biasOptimism biasForer effectBarnum effectSelf–serving biasActor–observer biasIllusion of controlIllusory superiorityFundamental attribution errorDefensive attribution hypothesisTrait ascription biasEffort justificationRisk compensationPeltzman effectHyperbolic discountingAppeal to noveltyIdentifiable victim effectSunk cost fallacyIrrational escalationEscalation of commitmentGeneration effectLoss aversionIKEA effectUnit biasZero–risk biasDisposition effectPseudocertainty effectProcessing difficulty effectEndowment effectBackfire effectSystem justificationReverse psychologyReactanceDecoy effectSocial comparison effectStatus quo biasAmbiguity biasInformation biasBelief biasRhyme–as–reason effectBike–shedding effectLaw of TrivialityConjunction fallacyOccam's razorLess–is–better effectMisattribution of memorySource confusionCryptomnesiaFalse memorySuggestibilitySpacing effectImplicit associationImplicit stereotypesStereotypical biasPrejudiceNegativity biasFading affect biasPeak–end ruleLeveling and sharpeningMisinformation effectSerial recall effectList–length effectDuration neglectModality effectMemory inhibitionPrimacy effectRecency effectPart–set cueing effectSerial–position effectSuffix effectLevels–of–processing effectAbsent–mindednessTesting effectNext–in–line effectGoogle effectTip of the tongue phenomenonWe notice things already primed inmemory or repeated oftenBizarre, funny, visually striking,or anthropomorphic things stick outmore than non-bizarre/unfunny thingsWe notice when something has changedWe are drawn to details that confirmour own existing beliefsWe notice flaws in others moreeasily than we notice flaws inourselvesWe tend to find stories and patternseven when looking at sparse dataWe fill in characteristics fromstereotypes, generalities, and priorhistoriesWe imagine things and people we'refamiliar with or fond of as betterWe simplify probabilities andnumbers to make them easier to thinkaboutWe think we know what other peopleare thinkingWe project our current mindset andassumptions onto the past and futureTo act, we must be confident we canmake an impact and feel what we dois importantTo stay focused, we favor theimmediate, relatable thing in frontof usTo get things done, we tend tocomplete things we've invested timeand energy inTo avoid mistakes, we aim topreserve autonomy and group status,and avoid irreversible decisionsWe favor simple–looking options andcomplete information over complex,ambiguous optionsWe edit and reinforce some memoriesafter the factWe discard specifics to formgeneralitiesWe reduce events and lists to theirkey elementsWe store memories differently basedon how they were experiencedSpin the wheel! Click the brain to pick a random bias.
100%

Logical fallacies

Errors in arguments. Hover over a name to see an example, or open a card and share its link.

48 logical fallacies

SciTopus

About

What are cognitive biases?

These are recurring tendencies in thinking that can make us notice some facts, overlook others, and jump to conclusions. The brain simplifies a complex world and sometimes gets things wrong. Learning about these traps can help us examine our own decisions.

How to use the wheel

Click a name or the brain: the wheel rotates to a bias and opens its card. Click empty space to return to the overview. Vertical scrolling changes the scale without moving the wheel; at the minimum scale, the page scrolls. On a trackpad, pinch to zoom and swipe horizontally to move the map. On a touchscreen, use one finger to scroll the page and two to move and zoom the wheel.

Logical fallacies

These are errors in constructing and evaluating arguments. They can overlap with cognitive biases but do not always mean the same thing. A wheel icon on a tile or card opens a related concept on the wheel. Cards distinguish equivalent concepts from related ones.

Authors and sources

Interactive adaptation: SciTopus, 2026. English wheel names and groups follow the original SVG. English cards combine short verbatim excerpts from Wikipedia contributors (CC BY-SA 4.0) and The School of Thought’s Your Bias Is with SciTopus adaptations and hypothetical examples. Original excerpts are normalized only for whitespace, initial capitals and final punctuation. Wikipedia links identify the source articles; field-by-field provenance and revision links are retained in the source audit.

The wheel preserves all 188 nodes, 20 groups, and connecting curves of the source diagram. It includes synonyms, memory effects, and methodological principles. This is an educational map, not an exhaustive classification or a diagnostic tool.

The adapted diagram is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0. Poster images retain their original authorship. Settings are stored only in your current browser session.

More science on SciTopus